mast


2006 Conference USA Football

Leaders
Team Statistics

2006 Conference USA Football Team Statistics FINAL - JANUARY 9, 2007


SCORING OFFENSE          G   TD  XP 2XP DXP  FG Saf  Pts   Avg
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. Houston............. 14   60  55   1   0  15   0  462  33.0
2. Tulsa............... 13   47  45   0   0  11   0  360  27.7
3. UTEP................ 12   41  34   0   0  16   0  328  27.3
4. SMU................. 12   41  36   2   0  13   0  325  27.1
5. Rice................ 13   45  38   1   0  12   2  350  26.9
6. Marshall............ 12   43  36   1   0   5   0  311  25.9
7. Southern Miss....... 14   44  42   0   0  16   1  356  25.4
8. Memphis............. 12   34  30   1   0  15   0  281  23.4
9. East Carolina....... 13   33  31   0   0  17   0  280  21.5
10.UCF................. 12   26  25   0   0  17   0  232  19.3
11.UAB................. 12   28  22   1   0  11   0  225  18.8
12.Tulane.............. 12   29  23   0   0   9   0  224  18.7

SCORING DEFENSE          G   TD  XP 2XP DXP  FG Saf  Pts   Avg
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. Southern Miss....... 14   35  30   0   0   6   1  260  18.6
2. Tulsa............... 13   30  24   2   0  18   0  262  20.2
3. East Carolina....... 13   35  31   0   0   9   1  270  20.8
4. Houston............. 14   40  34   2   0  17   0  329  23.5
5. SMU................. 12   38  36   0   0  10   0  294  24.5
6. UAB................. 12   37  29   1   0  14   1  297  24.8
7. UCF................. 12   42  35   0   0  18   2  345  28.8
8. Marshall............ 12   43  39   2   0  16   1  351  29.2
9. Memphis............. 12   47  44   0   0  13   0  365  30.4
10.UTEP................ 12   46  41   3   0  16   2  375  31.2
11.Rice................ 13   54  49   1   0  19   0  432  33.2
12.Tulane.............. 12   51  48   2   0  14   0  400  33.3

PASS OFFENSE             G   Att  Cmp Int  Pct.  Yds  Avg TD Yds/G
------------------------------------------------------------------
1. UTEP................ 12   446  289  17  64.8 3744  8.4 29 312.0
2. Houston............. 14   445  300   5  67.4 3889  8.7 30 277.8
3. Tulane.............. 12   440  245  12  55.7 2958  6.7 18 246.5
4. UCF................. 12   381  227  10  59.6 2805  7.4 14 233.8
5. East Carolina....... 13   430  248  11  57.7 3024  7.0 13 232.6
6. Tulsa............... 13   365  243   9  66.6 2944  8.1 16 226.5
7. Memphis............. 12   394  234  14  59.4 2695  6.8 21 224.6
8. Rice................ 13   435  248  14  57.0 2783  6.4 29 214.1
9. SMU................. 12   316  203  10  64.2 2331  7.4 29 194.2
10.Marshall............ 12   295  180  16  61.0 2247  7.6 16 187.2
11.UAB................. 12   304  177  12  58.2 2214  7.3 12 184.5
12.Southern Miss....... 14   353  198   7  56.1 2257  6.4 14 161.2

PASS DEFENSE             G   Att  Cmp Int  Pct.  Yds  Avg TD Yds/G
------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Tulsa............... 13   344  187   8  54.4 2063  6.0 13 158.7
2. Southern Miss....... 14   393  206  17  52.4 2524  6.4 14 180.3
3. East Carolina....... 13   376  222  16  59.0 2394  6.4 17 184.2
4. Houston............. 14   404  232  12  57.4 2912  7.2 21 208.0
5. UAB................. 12   317  200  12  63.1 2550  8.0 19 212.5
6. Rice................ 13   358  202  11  56.4 2946  8.2 32 226.6
7. Memphis............. 12   307  200  10  65.1 2768  9.0 24 230.7
8. UTEP................ 12   396  256  15  64.6 2910  7.3 18 242.5
9. SMU................. 12   418  268  11  64.1 2950  7.1 19 245.8
10.UCF................. 12   392  244  10  62.2 2986  7.6 22 248.8
11.Tulane.............. 12   386  247   8  64.0 3002  7.8 23 250.2
12.Marshall............ 12   397  253  12  63.7 3010  7.6 20 250.8

KICKOFF RETURNS          G   Ret  Yds   TD   Avg
------------------------------------------------
1. SMU................. 12    44 1010    1  23.0
2. UAB................. 12    43  937    0  21.8
3. Houston............. 14    50 1072    0  21.4
4. Memphis............. 12    47  993    0  21.1
5. Marshall............ 12    43  892    0  20.7
6. East Carolina....... 13    36  708    1  19.7
7. Tulsa............... 13    36  706    0  19.6
8. UCF................. 12    43  831    0  19.3
9. Southern Miss....... 14    44  845    0  19.2
10.Rice................ 13    58 1096    0  18.9
11.UTEP................ 12    45  835    1  18.6
12.Tulane.............. 12    49  853    0  17.4

PUNTING                  G  No. Yards Avg/P   PR  Avg  TB Net/P
---------------------------------------------------------------
1. SMU................. 12   51  2191  43.0  226  4.4   4  37.0
2. Memphis............. 12   43  1817  42.3  156  3.6   6  35.8
3. East Carolina....... 13   52  2226  42.8  271  5.2   6  35.3
4. Tulane.............. 12   63  2602  41.3  392  6.2   2  34.4
5. Southern Miss....... 14   53  2030  38.3  213  4.0   1  33.9
6. Rice................ 13   66  2527  38.3  197  3.0   5  33.8
7. UCF................. 12   46  1742  37.9  129  2.8   3  33.8
8. UTEP................ 12   51  1813  35.5   73  1.4   1  33.7
9. Marshall............ 12   40  1520  38.0   94  2.3   4  33.7
10.UAB................. 12   59  2314  39.2  203  3.4   7  33.4
11.Tulsa............... 13   48  1835  38.2  175  3.6   3  33.3
12.Houston............. 14   41  1552  37.9  281  6.9   2  30.0

                         |--Gained--||---Lost---|
TURNOVER MARGIN          G  Fum Int Tot Fum Int Tot Mar  Per/G
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. Houston............. 14   13  12  25  11   5  16  +9   0.64
2. Rice................ 13   18  11  29   7  14  21  +8   0.62
3. Southern Miss....... 14    8  17  25  12   7  19  +6   0.43
4. UAB................. 12   14  12  26   9  12  21  +5   0.42
5. East Carolina....... 13   11  16  27  12  11  23  +4   0.31
6. SMU................. 12   12  11  23  12  10  22  +1   0.08
7. UTEP................ 12   10  15  25   8  17  25  +0   0.00
   Memphis............. 12   10  10  20   6  14  20  +0   0.00
9. Tulsa............... 13    6   8  14  10   9  19  -5  -0.38
10.UCF................. 12    2  10  12   9  10  19  -7  -0.58
11.Marshall............ 12   10  12  22  15  16  31  -9  -0.75
12.Tulane.............. 12    6   8  14  13  12  25 -11  -0.92

RUSHING OFFENSE          G    Att   Yds   Avg  TD  Yds/G
--------------------------------------------------------
1. Southern Miss....... 14    535  2378   4.4  23  169.9
2. Houston............. 14    490  2356   4.8  29  168.3
3. Marshall............ 12    406  2005   4.9  23  167.1
4. Tulsa............... 13    484  2107   4.4  30  162.1
5. UCF................. 12    442  1673   3.8  11  139.4
6. Rice................ 13    438  1703   3.9  15  131.0
7. UAB................. 12    432  1507   3.5  14  125.6
8. SMU................. 12    404  1503   3.7   7  125.2
9. East Carolina....... 13    450  1502   3.3  16  115.5
10.Memphis............. 12    372  1340   3.6  12  111.7
11.Tulane.............. 12    353  1106   3.1  10   92.2
12.UTEP................ 12    289   701   2.4   8   58.4

RUSHING DEFENSE          G  Rushes  Yards  Avg.  TD  Yds/G
----------------------------------------------------------
1. SMU................. 12     403   1290   3.2  16  107.5
2. Southern Miss....... 14     456   1789   3.9  19  127.8
3. Tulsa............... 13     423   1796   4.2  17  138.2
4. Marshall............ 12     407   1681   4.1  22  140.1
5. Houston............. 14     479   2008   4.2  18  143.4
6. East Carolina....... 13     476   1887   4.0  17  145.2
7. UAB................. 12     409   1761   4.3  15  146.8
8. UCF................. 12     400   1791   4.5  16  149.2
9. Tulane.............. 12     428   1794   4.2  23  149.5
10.UTEP................ 12     439   1829   4.2  26  152.4
11.Memphis............. 12     478   2136   4.5  20  178.0
12.Rice................ 13     463   2442   5.3  19  187.8

TOTAL OFFENSE            G  Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Yds/G
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Houston............. 14  2356 3889   935  6245   6.7 59 446.1
2. Tulsa............... 13  2107 2944   849  5051   5.9 46 388.5
3. UCF................. 12  1673 2805   823  4478   5.4 25 373.2
4. UTEP................ 12   701 3744   735  4445   6.0 37 370.4
5. Marshall............ 12  2005 2247   701  4252   6.1 39 354.3
6. East Carolina....... 13  1502 3024   880  4526   5.1 29 348.2
7. Rice................ 13  1703 2783   873  4486   5.1 44 345.1
8. Tulane.............. 12  1106 2958   793  4064   5.1 28 338.7
9. Memphis............. 12  1340 2695   766  4035   5.3 33 336.2
10.Southern Miss....... 14  2378 2257   888  4635   5.2 37 331.1
11.SMU................. 12  1503 2331   720  3834   5.3 36 319.5
12.UAB................. 12  1507 2214   736  3721   5.1 26 310.1

TOTAL DEFENSE            G  Rush Pass Plys Yards  Avg  TD Yds/G
---------------------------------------------------------------
1. Tulsa............... 13  1796 2063  767  3859  5.0  30 296.8
2. Southern Miss....... 14  1789 2524  849  4313  5.1  33 308.1
3. East Carolina....... 13  1887 2394  852  4281  5.0  34 329.3
4. Houston............. 14  2008 2912  883  4920  5.6  39 351.4
5. SMU................. 12  1290 2950  821  4240  5.2  35 353.3
6. UAB................. 12  1761 2550  726  4311  5.9  34 359.2
7. Marshall............ 12  1681 3010  804  4691  5.8  42 390.9
8. UTEP................ 12  1829 2910  835  4739  5.7  44 394.9
9. UCF................. 12  1791 2986  792  4777  6.0  38 398.1
10.Tulane.............. 12  1794 3002  814  4796  5.9  46 399.7
11.Memphis............. 12  2136 2768  785  4904  6.2  44 408.7
12.Rice................ 13  2442 2946  821  5388  6.6  51 414.5

PUNT RETURN AVG          G   Ret  Yds   TD   Avg
------------------------------------------------
1. UTEP................ 12    13  260    2  20.0
2. UCF................. 12    18  257    1  14.3
3. Marshall............ 12    15  176    1  11.7
4. Memphis............. 12    15  155    0  10.3
5. Southern Miss....... 14    26  242    1   9.3
6. East Carolina....... 13    18  162    0   9.0
7. Tulane.............. 12    22  191    0   8.7
8. SMU................. 12    23  180    0   7.8
9. Houston............. 14    21  160    0   7.6
10.Rice................ 13    28  201    0   7.2
11.Tulsa............... 13    29  206    0   7.1
12.UAB................. 12    16   73    0   4.6

PASS EFFICIENCY          G   Att  Cmp   Pct  Int  Yds TD Effic
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. Houston............. 14   445  300  .674    5 3889 30 160.8
2. SMU................. 12   316  203  .642   10 2331 29 150.2
3. UTEP................ 12   446  289  .648   17 3744 29 149.1
4. Tulsa............... 13   365  243  .666    9 2944 16 143.9
5. Marshall............ 12   295  180  .610   16 2247 16 132.1
6. UCF................. 12   381  227  .596   10 2805 14 128.3
7. Memphis............. 12   394  234  .594   14 2695 21 127.3
8. Rice................ 13   435  248  .570   14 2783 29 126.3
9. UAB................. 12   304  177  .582   12 2214 12 124.5
10.East Carolina....... 13   430  248  .577   11 3024 13 121.6
11.Tulane.............. 12   440  245  .557   12 2958 18 120.2
12.Southern Miss....... 14   353  198  .561    7 2257 14 118.9

PASS DEF EFFICIENCY      G   Att  Cmp  Int  Pct.  Yds TD Effic
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. Southern Miss....... 14   393  206   17  52.4 2524 14 109.5
2. Tulsa............... 13   344  187    8  54.4 2063 13 112.6
3. East Carolina....... 13   376  222   16  59.0 2394 17 118.9
4. Houston............. 14   404  232   12  57.4 2912 21 129.2
5. SMU................. 12   418  268   11  64.1 2950 19 133.1
6. UTEP................ 12   396  256   15  64.6 2910 18 133.8
7. Marshall............ 12   397  253   12  63.7 3010 20 138.0
8. UCF................. 12   392  244   10  62.2 2986 22 139.6
9. UAB................. 12   317  200   12  63.1 2550 19 142.9
10.Tulane.............. 12   386  247    8  64.0 3002 23 144.8
11.Rice................ 13   358  202   11  56.4 2946 32 148.9
12.Memphis............. 12   307  200   10  65.1 2768 24 160.2

FIRST DOWNS              G  Rush Pass Pen Total
-----------------------------------------------
1. Houston............. 14   138  163  10   311
2. East Carolina....... 13   104  139  21   264
   Southern Miss....... 14   133  106  25   264
4. Tulsa............... 13   111  137  10   258
5. Rice................ 13    99  125  30   254
6. UCF................. 12    89  134   8   231
7. Tulane.............. 12    80  133  15   228
8. Memphis............. 12    81  117  24   222
9. UTEP................ 12    38  152  22   212
10.UAB................. 12    99   94  18   211
11.Marshall............ 12    96  101  13   210
12.SMU................. 12    85  101  19   205

OPPONENT 1ST DOWNS       G  Rush Pass Pen Total
-----------------------------------------------
1. Tulsa............... 13   106   90  19   215
2. UAB................. 12    97  108  18   223
3. Southern Miss....... 14   102  115   9   226
4. SMU................. 12    78  147  14   239
5. East Carolina....... 13   112  117  13   242
6. Memphis............. 12   115  116  13   244
7. UCF................. 12   104  138   9   251
8. Houston............. 14   105  130  18   253
   Tulane.............. 12    99  132  22   253
10.Marshall............ 12    98  134  23   255
11.Rice................ 13   118  127  11   256
12.UTEP................ 12   111  129  22   262

SACKS BY                 G  Sacks Yards
---------------------------------------
1. Rice................ 13     33   236
2. SMU................. 12     31   244
3. Marshall............ 12     30   196
4. UCF................. 12     25   183
   Southern Miss....... 14     25   164
6. Houston............. 14     23   138
   UAB................. 12     23   154
8. UTEP................ 12     22   122
9. Tulsa............... 13     20   139
10.Tulane.............. 12     19   134
11.East Carolina....... 13     18   100
12.Memphis............. 12     17   108

PENALTIES                G   No  Yds Avg/G
------------------------------------------
1. Memphis............. 12   52  448  37.3
2. East Carolina....... 13   59  511  39.3
3. UCF................. 12   55  484  40.3
4. Southern Miss....... 14   75  589  42.1
5. Rice................ 13   75  557  42.8
6. Tulsa............... 13   66  572  44.0
7. Tulane.............. 12   72  574  47.8
8. SMU................. 12   78  642  53.5
9. UTEP................ 12   73  651  54.2
10.Marshall............ 12   79  668  55.7
11.Houston............. 14   95  813  58.1
12.UAB................. 12   94  702  58.5

OPPONENT PENALTIES       G   No  Yds Avg/G
------------------------------------------
1. Rice................ 13  110  924  71.1
2. Southern Miss....... 14  106  848  60.6
3. UTEP................ 12   74  641  53.4
4. Memphis............. 12   67  625  52.1
5. UAB................. 12   68  595  49.6
6. SMU................. 12   75  592  49.3
7. Marshall............ 12   67  590  49.2
8. Tulane.............. 12   73  570  47.5
9. Tulsa............... 13   71  597  45.9
10.Houston............. 14   77  617  44.1
11.East Carolina....... 13   57  494  38.0
12.UCF................. 12   51  405  33.8

4TH-DN CONVERSIONS       G  Conv  Att   Pct
-------------------------------------------
1. Memphis............. 12    14   22  63.6
2. Tulsa............... 13    13   21  61.9
3. Rice................ 13    10   17  58.8
4. Houston............. 14    19   33  57.6
5. UAB................. 12    10   18  55.6
   East Carolina....... 13    10   18  55.6
7. UCF................. 12    10   24  41.7
8. Marshall............ 12     4   10  40.0
9. SMU................. 12     5   13  38.5
10.Southern Miss....... 14     6   18  33.3
11.Tulane.............. 12     4   14  28.6
12.UTEP................ 12     3   13  23.1

OPP 4TH-DN CONVERT       G  Conv  Att   Pct
-------------------------------------------
1. Tulane.............. 12     5   19  26.3
2. SMU................. 12     5   18  27.8
3. Houston............. 14     8   22  36.4
4. Marshall............ 12     6   16  37.5
5. UAB................. 12     5   10  50.0
6. UTEP................ 12    10   19  52.6
7. UCF................. 12     8   15  53.3
8. Southern Miss....... 14    17   31  54.8
9. Rice................ 13     9   16  56.2
10.Memphis............. 12     8   12  66.7
11.Tulsa............... 13    11   15  73.3
12.East Carolina....... 13    19   24  79.2

RED ZONE OFFENSE         G  RedZone Percent TDs  R/P  FG-AT Fumb/Int/Downs/Other
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. SMU................. 12   36-41     87.8  27  6/21  9-9     1/  0/  2/  2
2. Houston............. 14   50-57     87.7  37 20/17 13-16    2/  0/  1/  1
3. Tulsa............... 13   42-48     87.5  36 29/7   6-7     3/  0/  1/  1
4. Southern Miss....... 14   41-49     83.7  29 21/8  12-15    0/  0/  5/  0
5. Memphis............. 12   32-39     82.1  20 12/8  12-16    1/  2/  0/  0
6. UTEP................ 12   32-40     80.0  19  7/12 13-14    0/  2/  4/  1
7. UAB................. 12   28-36     77.8  19 13/6   9-11    2/  2/  2/  0
8. East Carolina....... 13   32-44     72.7  21 15/6  11-15    2/  2/  3/  1
9. Rice................ 13   34-47     72.3  29 11/18  5-9     1/  5/  2/  1
10.UCF................. 12   36-50     72.0  20 11/9  16-21    2/  1/  6/  0
11.Tulane.............. 12   28-40     70.0  19 10/9   9-12    1/  5/  2/  1
12.Marshall............ 12   25-36     69.4  22 14/8   3-6     1/  2/  2/  3

RED ZONE DEFENSE         G  RedZone Percent TDs  R/P  FG-AT Fumb/Int/Downs/Other
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Southern Miss....... 14   25-37     67.6  21 15/6   4-8     2/  3/  2/  1
2. East Carolina....... 13   33-43     76.7  28 17/11  5-7     3/  4/  0/  1
3. SMU................. 12   32-41     78.0  23 12/11  9-14    3/  1/  0/  0
4. Houston............. 14   36-46     78.3  27 18/9   9-13    2/  0/  2/  2
5. Marshall............ 12   41-52     78.8  30 20/10 11-13    1/  3/  3/  2
6. Tulane.............. 12   47-58     81.0  36 21/15 11-14    0/  1/  4/  3
7. UTEP................ 12   48-58     82.8  36 24/12 12-14    2/  2/  3/  1
8. UAB................. 12   29-35     82.9  19  9/10 10-11    1/  2/  1/  1
9. Tulsa............... 13   38-45     84.4  23 15/8  15-16    0/  2/  3/  1
10.UCF................. 12   32-37     86.5  20 10/10 12-14    0/  2/  1/  0
11.Memphis............. 12   40-46     87.0  29 18/11 11-12    1/  0/  2/  2
12.Rice................ 13   48-55     87.3  33 17/16 15-17    3/  1/  1/  0

ON-SIDE KICK SUCCESS     G  OnSide Percent
------------------------------------------
1. Tulsa............... 13    1-1    100.0
2. UTEP................ 12    1-2     50.0
3. Rice................ 13    1-3     33.3
4. Tulane.............. 12    0-2      0.0
   Memphis............. 12    0-1      0.0
   UCF................. 12    0-1      0.0
   Marshall............ 12    0-1      0.0
   East Carolina....... 13    0-1      0.0
   SMU................. 12    0-1      0.0
   Southern Miss....... 14    0-0      0.0
   UAB................. 12    0-0      0.0
   Houston............. 14    0-0      0.0

3RD-DN CONVERSIONS       G  Conv  Att   Pct
-------------------------------------------
1. Tulsa............... 13    74  161  46.0
2. Marshall............ 12    65  144  45.1
3. Houston............. 14    76  174  43.7
4. UCF................. 12    76  176  43.2
5. East Carolina....... 13    80  186  43.0
6. Southern Miss....... 14    75  181  41.4
7. Memphis............. 12    67  164  40.9
8. SMU................. 12    62  155  40.0
9. Tulane.............. 12    69  173  39.9
10.Rice................ 13    68  182  37.4
11.UTEP................ 12    55  150  36.7
12.UAB................. 12    48  149  32.2

OPP 3RD-DN CONVERT       G  Conv  Att   Pct
-------------------------------------------
1. Southern Miss....... 14    54  179  30.2
2. Tulsa............... 13    63  170  37.1
3. East Carolina....... 13    64  172  37.2
4. Rice................ 13    65  160  40.6
5. UAB................. 12    63  148  42.6
6. UTEP................ 12    72  164  43.9
7. Tulane.............. 12    73  161  45.3
8. SMU................. 12    79  173  45.7
9. Houston............. 14    90  193  46.6
10.Marshall............ 12    76  162  46.9
11.UCF................. 12    79  165  47.9
12.Memphis............. 12    75  153  49.0

SACKS AGAINST            G  Sacks Yards
---------------------------------------
1. Memphis............. 12     14    86
2. Tulsa............... 13     16    82
3. Marshall............ 12     19   109
   Southern Miss....... 14     19   112
5. UCF................. 12     22   125
6. UTEP................ 12     25   186
7. UAB................. 12     28   227
8. Tulane.............. 12     29   227
   East Carolina....... 13     29   209
10.SMU................. 12     32   225
11.Houston............. 14     33   218
12.Rice................ 13     35   266

FIELD GOALS              G  Made  Att    Pct
--------------------------------------------
1. Tulsa............... 13    11   12   .917
2. UTEP................ 12    16   20   .800
3. Houston............. 14    15   20   .750
4. SMU................. 12    13   18   .722
5. UCF................. 12    17   24   .708
6. UAB................. 12    11   16   .688
7. Memphis............. 12    15   22   .682
8. Southern Miss....... 14    16   24   .667
   Rice................ 13    12   18   .667
10.East Carolina....... 13    17   28   .607
11.Tulane.............. 12     9   15   .600
12.Marshall............ 12     5   13   .385

PAT KICKING              G  Made  Att    Pct
--------------------------------------------
1. East Carolina....... 13    31   31  1.000
   UCF................. 12    25   25  1.000
3. Southern Miss....... 14    42   43   .977
4. SMU................. 12    36   37   .973
5. Houston............. 14    55   57   .965
6. Tulsa............... 13    45   47   .957
7. Rice................ 13    38   40   .950
8. Memphis............. 12    30   32   .938
9. UTEP................ 12    34   37   .919
10.UAB................. 12    22   24   .917
11.Marshall............ 12    36   40   .900
12.Tulane.............. 12    23   28   .821

TIME OF POSSESSION       G  Total Time   Avg/G
----------------------------------------------
1. Tulsa............... 13     418:20    32:10
2. UAB................. 12     382:24    31:52
3. Southern Miss....... 14     439:05    31:21
4. Rice................ 13     405:15    31:10
5. East Carolina....... 13     391:45    30:08
6. UCF................. 12     359:49    29:59
7. Houston............. 14     415:05    29:38
8. Marshall............ 12     354:51    29:34
9. Tulane.............. 12     344:12    28:41
10.Memphis............. 12     343:17    28:36
11.UTEP................ 12     339:31    28:17
12.SMU................. 12     328:57    27:24

KICKOFF COVERAGE         G  No. Yards   Avg  Retn  TB NetAvg
------------------------------------------------------------
1. SMU................. 12   63  3859  61.3   837  16   42.9
2. Marshall............ 12   59  3481  59.0   706  16   41.6
3. Tulsa............... 13   66  3666  55.5   827   7   40.9
4. Houston............. 14   87  5038  57.9  1025  23   40.8
5. UAB................. 12   48  2971  61.9   671  17   40.8
6. Southern Miss....... 14   74  4625  62.5  1041  29   40.6
7. UCF................. 12   56  3372  60.2   995   8   39.6
8. UTEP................ 12   69  4134  59.9  1107  18   38.7
9. East Carolina....... 13   62  3533  57.0   800  17   38.6
10.Rice................ 13   65  3622  55.7   996   6   38.6
11.Memphis............. 12   60  3532  58.9  1119   7   37.9
12.Tulane.............. 12   48  2688  56.0   926   6   34.2



ON-SIDE KICK ALLOWED     G  OnSide Percent
------------------------------------------
1. UTEP................ 12    0-2      0.0
   Southern Miss....... 14    0-2      0.0
   Memphis............. 12    0-2      0.0
   Marshall............ 12    0-1      0.0
   SMU................. 12    0-1      0.0
   Rice................ 13    0-1      0.0
   Houston............. 14    0-1      0.0
   Tulsa............... 13    0-0      0.0
   UAB................. 12    0-0      0.0
   Tulane.............. 12    0-0      0.0
11.East Carolina....... 13    1-5     20.0
12.UCF................. 12    1-1    100.0

Individual Statistics

2006 Conference USA Football Individual Statistics FINAL - JANUARY 9, 2007


 RUSHING            Team Cl  G  Att  Yds   Avg TD Long Yds/G
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 1. BRADSHAW, Ahmad MAR  JR 12  249 1523   6.1 19   67 126.9
 2. FLETCHER, Dam.. USM  FR 13  276 1388   5.0 11   36 106.8
 3. SMITH, Kevin... UCF  SO  9  206  934   4.5  7   34 103.8
 4. FORTÉ, Matt.... TLN  JR  9  163  859   5.3  8   64  95.4
 5. SMITH, Quinton. RICE SR 13  211 1096   5.2 10   69  84.3
 6. DOSS, Joseph... MEM  JR 12  224  910   4.1  7   32  75.8
 7. BATTLE, Jackie. HOU  SR 13  184  943   5.1 15   61  72.5
 8. ALRIDGE, A..... HOU  JR 14   95  959  10.1  8   87  68.5
 9. TENNIAL, C..... TLS  JR 13  171  845   4.9 14   33  65.0
 10.FRACTIOUS, Brdn ECU  SR 13  155  660   4.3  4   37  50.8

 PASSING AVG/GAME   Team Cl  G Att Cmp Int  Pct.  Yds TD Avg/G
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 1. PALMER, Jordan. UTEP SR 12 428 281  14  65.7 3585 26 298.8
 2. KOLB, Kevin.... HOU  SR 14 432 292   4  67.6 3809 30 272.1
 3. RICARD, Lester. TLN  SR 12 400 229  10  57.2 2795 18 232.9
 4. PINKNEY, James. ECU  SR 13 397 232  10  58.4 2783 12 214.1
 5. HANKINS, Martin MEM  JR 12 377 226  13  59.9 2550 18 212.5
 6. SMITH, Paul.... TLS  JR 13 350 233   9  66.6 2727 15 209.8
 7. WILLIS, Justin. SMU  FR 11 270 182   6  67.4 2047 26 186.1
 8. MOFFETT, Steven UCF  SR 10 215 119   5  55.3 1385  8 138.5
 9. YOUNG, Jeremy.. USM  JR 14 281 161   6  57.3 1769 12 126.4
 10.MORRIS, Bernard MAR  JR 11 188 116  12  61.7 1346  8 122.4

 TOTAL OFFENSE      Team Cl  G Rush Pass Plays Total Yds/G
 ---------------------------------------------------------
 1. PALMER, Jordan. UTEP SR 12  -76 3585   476  3509 292.4
 2. KOLB, Kevin.... HOU  SR 14  154 3809   543  3963 283.1
 3. SMITH, Paul.... TLS  JR 13  288 2727   451  3015 231.9
 4. PINKNEY, James. ECU  SR 13  216 2783   502  2999 230.7
 5. RICARD, Lester. TLN  SR 12 -112 2795   460  2683 223.6
 6. WILLIS, Justin. SMU  FR 11  354 2047   402  2401 218.3
 7. HANKINS, Martin MEM  JR 12  -12 2550   410  2538 211.5
 8. MORRIS, Bernard MAR  JR 11  324 1346   270  1670 151.8
 9. YOUNG, Jeremy.. USM  JR 14  224 1769   362  1993 142.4
 10.MOFFETT, Steven UCF  SR 10   -7 1385   246  1378 137.8

 RECEPTIONS/GAME    Team Cl  G  Rec  Yds TD Long Avg/C Rec/G
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 1. WALKER, Mike... UCF  SR 12   90 1178  7   54  13.1  7.50
 2. DILLARD, Jarett RICE SO 13   91 1247 21   65  13.7  7.00
 3. HIGGINS, J..... UTEP SR 12   82 1319 13   79  16.1  6.83
 4. MARSHALL, V.... HOU  SR 14   80  979  8   77  12.2  5.71
 5. ALLISON, Aundre ECU  SR 11   62  708  4   53  11.4  5.64
 6. MOSS, Idris.... TLS  SR 13   58  803  1   58  13.8  4.46
 7. DAVIS, Damarcus TLN  SR 12   51  607  4   50  11.9  4.25
 8. AVERY, Donnie.. HOU  JR 14   57  852  5   56  14.9  4.07
 9. BROWN, Preston. TLN  SR 11   44  467  2   35  10.6  4.00
 10.SCOTT, Ryan.... MEM  SR 12   47  520  3   82  11.1  3.92

 RECEIVE YDS/GAME   Team Cl  G  Rec  Yds TD Long Avg/C Yds/G
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 1. HIGGINS, J..... UTEP SR 12   82 1319 13   79  16.1 109.9
 2. WALKER, Mike... UCF  SR 12   90 1178  7   54  13.1  98.2
 3. DILLARD, Jarett RICE SO 13   91 1247 21   65  13.7  95.9
 4. MARSHALL, V.... HOU  SR 14   80  979  8   77  12.2  69.9
 5. ALLISON, Aundre ECU  SR 11   62  708  4   53  11.4  64.4
 6. MOSS, Idris.... TLS  SR 13   58  803  1   58  13.8  61.8
 7. AVERY, Donnie.. HOU  JR 14   57  852  5   56  14.9  60.9
 8. EDWARDS, Willie UAB  JR 12   39  719  2   71  18.4  59.9
 9. SLATE, Cody.... MAR  FR 12   43  684  6   75  15.9  57.0
 10.CALHOUN, Duke.. MEM  FR 12   42  681  6   60  16.2  56.8

 ALL PURPOSE        Team Cl  G Rush  Rcv   PR   KR  Yds Avg/G
 ------------------------------------------------------------
 1. HIGGINS, J..... UTEP SR 12   -2 1319  281  275 1873 156.1
 2. BRADSHAW, Ahmad MAR  JR 12 1523  129    6    0 1658 138.2
 3. FORTÉ, Matt.... TLN  JR  9  859  360    0    0 1219 135.4
 4. ALRIDGE, A..... HOU  JR 14  959  274    0  603 1836 131.1
 5. SMITH, Quinton. RICE SR 13 1096  410    0  102 1608 123.7
 6. SMITH, Kevin... UCF  SO  9  934  158    0    0 1092 121.3
 7. FLETCHER, Dam.. USM  FR 13 1388  142    0    0 1530 117.7
 8. MOSS, Idris.... TLS  SR 13   63  803  197  378 1441 110.8
 9. DILLARD, Jarett RICE SO 13    5 1247    0   33 1285  98.8
 10.WALKER, Mike... UCF  SR 12    0 1178    0    0 1178  98.2

 INTERCEPTIONS      Team Cl  G  Int  Yds TD Long Int/G
 -----------------------------------------------------
 1. DEMPS, Quintin. UTEP JR 12    7   61  0   24  0.58
 2. GULLEY, Will... HOU  SR 13    5   43  0   18  0.38
 3. MCDONALD, B.... MEM  SR 12    4   83  0   42  0.33
    RICHMOND,LeVan. USM  JR 12    4   69  0   31  0.33
    RASHAD, S...... UCF  SO 12    4   65  0   33  0.33
    SKEHAN, David.. TLN  JR 12    4   41  1   30  0.33
 7. ROSS, Kasey.... ECU  SR 13    4  128  2   77  0.31
    BLACKSHIRE, B.. TLS  SR 13    4   26  0   18  0.31
    PARKER, Pierre. ECU  SR 13    4    5  0    3  0.31
 10.HENDRIX, Caleb. USM  SR 14    4    8  0    8  0.29

 PASS EFFICIENCY    Team Cl  G Att Cmp Int  Pct.  Yds TD  Eff.
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 1. KOLB, Kevin.... HOU  SR 14 432 292   4  67.6 3809 30 162.7
 2. WILLIS, Justin. SMU  FR 11 270 182   6  67.4 2047 26 158.4
 3. PALMER, Jordan. UTEP SR 12 428 281  14  65.7 3585 26 149.5
 4. SMITH, Paul.... TLS  JR 13 350 233   9  66.6 2727 15 141.0
 5. RICARD, Lester. TLN  SR 12 400 229  10  57.2 2795 18 125.8
 6. HANKINS, Martin MEM  JR 12 377 226  13  59.9 2550 18 125.6
 7. MORRIS, Bernard MAR  JR 11 188 116  12  61.7 1346  8 123.1
 8. PINKNEY, James. ECU  SR 13 397 232  10  58.4 2783 12 122.3
 9. WILLIAMS, Chris UAB  SR 10 168  95   7  56.5 1112  9 121.5
 10.YOUNG, Jeremy.. USM  JR 14 281 161   6  57.3 1769 12 120.0

 PUNT RETURN AVG    Team Cl  G  Ret  Yds TD Long   Avg
 -----------------------------------------------------
 1. HIGGINS, J..... UTEP SR 12   12  281  2   88  23.4
 2. SPANN, Emmanuel MAR  SO 12   12  144  0   25  12.0
 3. MCDONALD, B.... MEM  SR 12   14  152  0   31  10.9
 4. KING, Brandon.. RICE SO 10   13  115  0   19   8.8
 5. SMITH, Fred.... TLN  JR 12   22  191  0   36   8.7
 6. FAULK, Jasper.. USM  SR 14   23  197  0   39   8.6
 7. WARREN, Blake.. SMU  SR 12   21  174  0   54   8.3
 8. MOSS, Idris.... TLS  SR 13   25  197  0   30   7.9
 9. MARSHALL, V.... HOU  SR 14   20  148  0   35   7.4

 KICK RETURN AVG    Team Cl  G  Ret  Yds TD Long   Avg
 -----------------------------------------------------
 1. GRANDBERRY, M.. MEM  SO 12   21  517  0   61  24.6
 2. SANDERS, E..... SMU  FR 12   12  288  0   43  24.0
 3. ELLIOTT, M..... UAB  SR 12   27  638  0   50  23.6
 4. JOHNSON, Chris. ECU  JR 12   21  482  1   96  23.0
 5. SPANN, Emmanuel MAR  SO 12   13  298  0   37  22.9
 6. ALRIDGE, A..... HOU  JR 14   27  603  0   76  22.3
 7. SUMRALL,Brandon USM  JR 14   19  401  0   49  21.1
 8. MOSS, Idris.... TLS  SR 13   18  378  0   44  21.0
 9. FRANCIS, Curtis UCF  JR 12   21  434  0   59  20.7
 10.SMALL, Chubb... MAR  SO 12   18  361  0   34  20.1

 PUNTING            Team Cl  G Punts   Yds Long   Avg
 ----------------------------------------------------
 1. MORSTEAD, T.... SMU  SO 12    50  2191   65  43.8
 2. DOUGHERTY, Ryan ECU  SR 13    51  2226   72  43.6
 3. GIBSON, Michael MEM  SR 12    42  1812   73  43.1
 4. BECKMAN, Chris. TLN  SR 12    52  2207   52  42.4
 5. O'CONN0R, Ian.. MAR  SR 12    37  1520   69  41.1
 6. MULLINS, Parker UAB  SR 12    58  2314   53  39.9
 7. HORNE, Aaron... UCF  SR 12    44  1742   57  39.6
 8. SCRUGGS, Jared. RICE SR 13    63  2444   61  38.8
 9. BAREFOOT, Britt USM  SO 14    52  2007   68  38.6
 10.HOTCHKISS, Ryan UTEP SR 12    50  1813   53  36.3

 SCORING            Team Cl  G  TD XPT  FG 2XP  Pts Pts/G
 --------------------------------------------------------
 1. BRADSHAW, Ahmad MAR  JR 12  21   0   0   0  126  10.5
 2. DILLARD, Jarett RICE SO 13  21   0   0   0  126   9.7
 3. HIGGINS, J..... UTEP SR 12  15   0   0   0   90   7.5
 4. TENNIAL, C..... TLS  JR 13  16   0   0   0   96   7.4
 5. BELL, Ben...... HOU  SO 13   0  51  14   0   93   7.2
 6. BATTLE, Jackie. HOU  SR 13  15   0   0   0   90   6.9
 7. TORRES, Michael UCF  JR 11   0  25  17   0   76   6.9
 8. SCHNEIDER, Re.. UTEP SR 12   0  34  16   0   82   6.8
 9. FORTÉ, Matt.... TLN  JR  9  10   0   0   0   60   6.7
 10.McCALEB, Darren USM  SR 14   0  42  16   0   90   6.4

 SCORING (TDs)      Team Cl  G  TD Rush Pass Ret PAT Pts Pts/G
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 1. BRADSHAW, Ahmad MAR  JR 12  21   19    2   0   0 126  10.5
 2. DILLARD, Jarett RICE SO 13  21    0   21   0   0 126   9.7
 3. HIGGINS, J..... UTEP SR 12  15    0   13   2   0  90   7.5
 4. TENNIAL, C..... TLS  JR 13  16   14    2   0   0  96   7.4
 5. BATTLE, Jackie. HOU  SR 13  15   15    0   0   0  90   6.9
 6. FORTÉ, Matt.... TLN  JR  9  10    8    2   0   0  60   6.7
 7. SMITH, Quinton. RICE SR 13  12   10    2   0   1  74   5.7
 8. FLETCHER, Dam.. USM  FR 13  11   11    0   0   0  66   5.1
 9. WHITE, Corey... UAB  SR 10   8    6    2   0   0  48   4.8
 10.SMITH, Kevin... UCF  SO  9   7    7    0   0   0  42   4.7

 SCORING (KICK)     Team Cl  G   PATs    FGs   Pts Pts/G
 -------------------------------------------------------
 1. BELL, Ben...... HOU  SO 13  51-53   14-18   93   7.2
 2. TORRES, Michael UCF  JR 11  25-25   17-24   76   6.9
 3. SCHNEIDER, Re.. UTEP SR 12  34-37   16-20   82   6.8
 4. McCALEB, Darren USM  SR 14  42-42   16-24   90   6.4
 5. LEE, Robert.... ECU  SR 10  22-22   14-23   64   6.4
 6. REAGAN, Matt... MEM  FR 10  25-26   12-17   61   6.1
 7. MORSTEAD, T.... SMU  SO 12  34-35   13-18   73   6.1
 8. TRACY, Jarod... TLS  SO 13  43-45   11-12   76   5.8
 9. FANGMEIER, C... RICE FR 12  35-35    8-11   59   4.9
 10.BINSWANGER, Ant MAR  JR 12  36-40    5-13   51   4.2


 FIELD GOALS        Team Cl  G   FG  FGA  Pct.  FG/G
 ---------------------------------------------------
 1. TORRES, Michael UCF  JR 11   17   24  70.8  1.55
 2. LEE, Robert.... ECU  SR 10   14   23  60.9  1.40
 3. SCHNEIDER, Re.. UTEP SR 12   16   20  80.0  1.33
 4. REAGAN, Matt... MEM  FR 10   12   17  70.6  1.20
 5. McCALEB, Darren USM  SR 14   16   24  66.7  1.14
 6. MORSTEAD, T.... SMU  SO 12   13   18  72.2  1.08
 7. BELL, Ben...... HOU  SO 13   14   18  77.8  1.08
 8. TRACY, Jarod... TLS  SO 13   11   12  91.7  0.85
 9. WATERS, Swayze. UAB  SO 12    9   12  75.0  0.75
    THEVENOT, Ross. TLN  FR 12    9   15  60.0  0.75

 FIELD GOAL PCT     Team Cl  G   FG  FGA Long  Pct.
 --------------------------------------------------
 1. SCHNEIDER, Re.. UTEP SR 12   16   20   56  80.0
 2. BELL, Ben...... HOU  SO 13   14   18   42  77.8
 3. WATERS, Swayze. UAB  SO 12    9   12   42  75.0
 4. MORSTEAD, T.... SMU  SO 12   13   18   50  72.2
 5. TORRES, Michael UCF  JR 11   17   24   51  70.8
 6. REAGAN, Matt... MEM  FR 10   12   17   42  70.6
 7. McCALEB, Darren USM  SR 14   16   24   50  66.7
 8. LEE, Robert.... ECU  SR 10   14   23   48  60.9
 9. THEVENOT, Ross. TLN  FR 12    9   15   45  60.0
 10.BINSWANGER, Ant MAR  JR 12    5   13   50  38.5

 PAT KICKING PCT    Team Cl  G Made  Att   Pct.
 ----------------------------------------------
 1. McCALEB, Darren USM  SR 14   42   42  100.0
    FANGMEIER, C... RICE FR 12   35   35  100.0
    TORRES, Michael UCF  JR 11   25   25  100.0
    LEE, Robert.... ECU  SR 10   22   22  100.0
 5. MORSTEAD, T.... SMU  SO 12   34   35   97.1
 6. BELL, Ben...... HOU  SO 13   51   53   96.2
 7. REAGAN, Matt... MEM  FR 10   25   26   96.2
 8. TRACY, Jarod... TLS  SO 13   43   45   95.6
 9. SCHNEIDER, Re.. UTEP SR 12   34   37   91.9
 10.BINSWANGER, Ant MAR  JR 12   36   40   90.0


2006 Conference USA Football Individual Statistics FINAL - JANUARY 9, 2007

 TACKLES (All positions)
 Player             Team Cl  G Pos Solo Ast Total Avg/G Sack
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 1. COLLAVO, Troy.. UTEP SR 12 LB    42  83   125  10.4  2.0
 2. STURDIVANT, Joe SMU  SR 12       80  29   109   9.1  0.0
 3. RAINES, Brian.. RICE SO 13       85  33   118   9.1  4.5
 4. KEYES, Curtis.. MAR  SR 12 DB    55  49   104   8.7  0.0
 5. COUCH, Matt.... MAR  SR 12 LB    35  61    96   8.0  3.0
 6. COLEMAN, Nelson TLS  JR 13 LB    43  55    98   7.5  1.5
 7. McRATH, Gerald. USM  SO 14 LB    53  51   104   7.4  1.5
 8. MCDONALD, B.... MEM  SR 12 DB    45  39    84   7.0  0.0
 9. SMITH, Wesley.. MEM  SR 10       36  33    69   6.9  0.0
 10.DOWNS, Andray.. RICE SR 13       62  26    88   6.8  0.0
 11.GRANT, Heath... MEM  JR 12 LB    37  44    81   6.8  1.0
 12.CARRINGTON, R.. SMU  JR 12       60  20    80   6.7  4.0
    SKEHAN, David.. TLN  JR 12       55  25    80   6.7  0.5
 14.GULLEY, Will... HOU  SR 13       46  40    86   6.6  0.0
 15.SPILLMAN, C.J.. MAR  SO 12 DB    38  41    79   6.6  0.0
 16.MCCLELLAN, Albe MAR  SO 12 DE    38  39    77   6.4 11.5
 17.ROUTE, Israel.. TLN  SR 11       56  14    70   6.4  0.0
    MCCRARY, Q..... MEM  JR 11 LB    29  41    70   6.4  0.0
 19.FLESKOSKI, Joe. UTEP SR 12 DB    35  40    75   6.2  0.5
 20.COTTON, Quentin ECU  SO 11 LB    35  33    68   6.2  2.0
 21.LUBOJASKY, Cody HOU  SO 14       34  50    84   6.0  0.0
    JOHNSON, Josh.. MAR  SO 12 LB    25  47    72   6.0  1.5
 23.McCRAY, Wilton. SMU  JR 12       42  28    70   5.8  0.0
 24.ALLEN, Trent... HOU  JR 14       33  48    81   5.8  0.0
 25.BUNTING, Nick.. TLS  SR 13 LB    32  43    75   5.8  2.0
 26.JACKSON, Greg.. MEM  SO 12 LB    38  31    69   5.8  1.5
 27.VENSON, Jason.. UCF  SO 11 DB    43  20    63   5.7  0.0
 28.SUMRALL,Brandon USM  JR 14 DB    48  32    80   5.7  2.0
 29.FLOURNOY, Jamar ECU  SR 13       40  33    73   5.6  0.0
 30.DEMPS, Quintin. UTEP JR 12 DB    31  36    67   5.6  0.0
 31.NEAL, Johnell.. UCF  SO 12 DB    47  19    66   5.5  0.0
    BELL, Pierre... ECU  SO 12 LB    38  28    66   5.5  0.5
    JOHNSON, James. MAR  SO 12 DB    41  25    66   5.5  0.0
 34.PRICE, Chad.... RICE SR 13       43  28    71   5.5  1.0
 35.DUNBAR, Will... UAB  JR 12 DB    44  21    65   5.4  1.0
 36.ALEXANDER, K... TLS  SR 13 DB    42  28    70   5.4  0.0
 37.ROGERS, Justin. SMU  SR 11       41  18    59   5.4  9.5
 38.SMITH, Mustaki. UAB  SR 12 LB    29  35    64   5.3  1.0
 39.SPENCE, Emeri.. UTEP JR 11 LB    25  33    58   5.3  0.0
 40.MILLER, Ernest. HOU  SO 14       40  33    73   5.2  1.0
 41.AMY, Braxton... UTEP FR 10 DB    18  34    52   5.2  0.0
 42.HENDERSON, Joe. UAB  SO 12 LB    42  19    61   5.1  1.0
 43.RUCKER, Marcus. RICE SR 13       45  20    65   5.0  4.0
    TISDALE, Bryant UTEP SR 12 DB    31  29    60   5.0  0.0
 45.WILSON, Fred... ECU  JR 13 LB    40  24    64   4.9  0.0
 46.RIDEAU, Rodney. HOU  SO 12       25  34    59   4.9  0.0
 47.GOOSBY, Joe.... TLN  JR 11       33  21    54   4.9  2.5
 48.FERGUSON, Josh. UTEP JR 12 DB    32  26    58   4.8  0.0
 49.BLACKSHIRE, B.. TLS  SR 13 DB    38  24    62   4.8  0.0
 50.ESKRIDGE, Van.. ECU  FR 13 LB    38  22    60   4.6  1.5

 SACKS              Team Cl  G Pos Solo Ast  Yds Total Avg/G
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 1. MCCLELLAN, Albe MAR  SO 12 DE    10   3   80  11.5  0.96
 2. ROGERS, Justin. SMU  SR 11        9   1   85   9.5  0.86
 3. MUSE, Cory..... SMU  JR 10        6   2   58   7.0  0.70
 4. GORDON, Court.. RICE SR 13        8   0   55   8.0  0.62
 5. DOUZABLE, Leger UCF  JR 12 DT     6   2   61   7.0  0.58
 6. MCSWAIN, Larry. UAB  SR 11 DE     6   0   49   6.0  0.55
 7. HUNT, Phillip.. HOU  SO 14 DE     7   1   39   7.5  0.54
 8. LATU, Robert... TLS  SR 13 DE     6   0   34   6.0  0.46
 9. TERRELL, Greg.. MEM  FR 11 DE     3   4   27   5.0  0.45
 10.HAYWOOD, A..... SMU  SR 12        5   0   40   5.0  0.42

 TACKLES FOR LOSS   Team Cl  G Pos Solo Ast  Yds Total Avg/G
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 1. MCCLELLAN, Albe MAR  SO 12 DE    15   8  101  19.0  1.58
 2. HAYWOOD, A..... SMU  SR 12       14   5   71  16.5  1.38
 3. ROGERS, Justin. SMU  SR 11       13   4   95  15.0  1.36
 4. GORDON, Court.. RICE SR 13       15   0   74  15.0  1.15
 5. PRINCE, Mart... USM  JR 14 DL    14   4   50  16.0  1.14
 6. MUSE, Cory..... SMU  JR 10        9   3   63  10.5  1.05
 7. RAINES, Brian.. RICE SO 13       12   1   52  12.5  0.96
 8. DOUZABLE, Leger UCF  JR 12 DT     9   3   71  10.5  0.88
 9. MCSWAIN, Larry. UAB  SR 11 DE     8   3   55   9.5  0.86
 10.HENDERSON, Rob. USM  JR 14 DE    10   4   57  12.0  0.86

 FUMBLES FORCED     Team Cl  G   Num Avg/G
 -----------------------------------------
 1. RAINES, Brian.. RICE SO 13     5  0.38
 2. ROUTE, Israel.. TLN  SR 11     4  0.36
 3. MCCLELLAN, Albe MAR  SO 12     4  0.33
    GREER, Shavar.. MAR  SR 12     4  0.33
 5. STURDIVANT, Joe SMU  SR 12     3  0.25
    SENDEJO, Andrew RICE FR 12     3  0.25
 7. SUMRALL,Brandon USM  JR 14     3  0.21
 8. SMITH, Wesley.. MEM  SR 10     2  0.20
    STEED, B.J..... UAB  FR 10     2  0.20
 10.CHAVIS, Wendell ECU  JR 11     2  0.18

 FUMBLES RCVD       Team Cl  G   Num Avg/G
 -----------------------------------------
 1. PRICE, Chad.... RICE SR 13     4  0.31
 2. MUSE, Cory..... SMU  JR 10     3  0.30
 3. BROWN, Cornel.. UTEP FR 12     3  0.25
    BONDS, Brandon. SMU  SR 12     3  0.25
 5. UNDERWOOD, Juan MAR  SR  9     2  0.22
 6. KING, Brandon.. RICE SO 10     2  0.20
 7. SPENCE, Emeri.. UTEP JR 11     2  0.18
    BRITTEN, Zach.. UAB  JR 11     2  0.18
 9. GRANT, Heath... MEM  JR 12     2  0.17
    EVANS, Will.... UAB  SR 12     2  0.17

 PASSES DEFENDED    Team Cl  G Brup  Int Total Avg/G
 ---------------------------------------------------
 1. HENDRIX, Caleb. USM  SR 14   13    4    17  1.21
 2. ROUTE, Israel.. TLN  SR 11   12    1    13  1.18
 3. RASHAD, S...... UCF  SO 12   10    4    14  1.17
 4. FAULK, Jasper.. USM  SR 14   13    2    15  1.07
 5. ROSS, Kasey.... ECU  SR 13    9    4    13  1.00
    DEMPS, Quintin. UTEP JR 12    5    7    12  1.00
    JOHNSON, James. MAR  SO 12   10    2    12  1.00
 8. GASTON, Willie. HOU  SR 14   12    1    13  0.93
 9. SANDERS, Kevin. UAB  SO 12    8    3    11  0.92
 10.KING, Brandon.. RICE SO 10    6    2     8  0.80


2006 Conference USA Football Individual Statistics FINAL - JANUARY 9, 2007





C-USA Photo Galleries
C-USA Network
C-USA All-Access